The Second World Congress on Matriarchal Studies happened at San
Marcos, Texas, USA from September 29 to October 2 this year. Hosted by
the University of Texas the Congress saw an interface between
researcher scholars from across the globe with representatives of
indigenous peoples who are still practicing matriarchy and/or
matriliny. The first Congress was held at Luxembourg in 2003. This
writer was invited as a speaker representing the Khasi matrilineal
society.
Matriliny and matriarchy are contentious subjects. Yet because of their
controversial nature they have generated intense debate in academic circles. An
indirect offshoot of the feminist movement of the seventies, the different
dimensions of matriarchy are today accepted subjects of research. Feminists
assert that what is history today is a distortion of matriarchal values which
has been cleverly replaced by patriarchy – a culture that is inherently linked
to capitalism and the destruction of nature.
Researchers in matriarchy contend that ‘the social order in matriarchal
societies is based on intelligent principles cultivated over thousands of years
of human experience. These are well-balanced and peaceful societies that
practice reciprocal equality in which every individual irrespective of
sex/gender and age is treated with respect’. They claim that matriarchy is a
non-violent social order in which all living creatures are respected. This
theory is supported by the very nature of matriarchy which means ‘centred around
the mother’ and the mother as the birth-giver, the carer, the nurturer cannot
also be violent, destructive and non-egalitarian.
The above argument seems to hold true of the Khasis and Garos of Meghalaya
both of which are practicing matrilineal societies. In both these societies,
lineage is derived from the mother’s clan line. Ancestral as well as
self-acquired property of parents’ passes through the youngest daughter or the
khatduh. However, the khatduh is only the custodian of that property. Decisions
about the use of the ancestral property vests with the maternal uncle or the
mama. Usually the decision is arrived at through consensus. Both these societies
have been non-violent as opposed to the other societies of the North Eastern
region which have engaged in inter and intra-tribal warfares. There is no
visible class system. Land and all other natural resources were community
property. In that sense the societies were egalitarian.
Until the last three decades of the twentieth century, land and its resources
remained a community property. But with the attainment of statehood in 1972 and
the consequent ushering in of development projects, land became a purchasable
commodity. It was given a monetary value. This was the first onslaught on the
practice of community ownership of land. Heated debates are going on in both
these societies as to how the notion of private property came in and how this
ugly trend can be reversed.
What was surprising to this writer is the existence of at least a dozen or
more matriarchal and matrilineal societies in different parts of the world and
that the Khasis and Garo were not so unique after all. Indigenous peoples of the
USA namely the Bear Clan of the Ohio Seneca commonly known as the Iroquois
people practice matriarchy. So also the Syilx peoples of Okanagan, Canada and
the Tygh peoples of the Confederated Tribes of Warm Springs, USA. Other
matriarchal societies include the Tauregs of Sub-Saharan Africa, the Juchitan of
Mexico, the Sierra Juarez Zapotecs of Oaxaca, the Kuna peoples of Panama, the
Shipiho of the Upper Amazon, the Samoa people of New Zealand, the Ashante tribes
of Ghana, Africa, the Khoekhoe people of South Africa, the Mosuo of China and
the Minangkabau of Sumatra, Indonesia, to name a few.
The purpose of the Congress was to initiate and encourage a multi-cultural,
scientific discussion, networking and collaboration between scholars occupied
with non-ideological research on what can be described as matriarchal societies.
Scholars feel that while matrilineal and matrifocal are clearly defined
anthropological terms, the significance of ‘matriarchal’ as a specific cultural
concept needed to be explored because the scientific studies of matriarchal
cultures is not commonly known or accessible. The Congress is a culmination of
decades of research often at great cost particularly by scholars from Germany.
Such innovative scholarship was unwelcome in the West at that time and anyone
desirous of getting into this area was seen as a challenge to the status quo of
patriarchy and hence ostracized by their universities.
One scholar whose pioneering effort is widely recognized today is Heide Goettner-Abendroth. She has plodded on for close to three decades to draw the attention of the world to values embedded in matriarchal societies which she calls ‘balanced and peaceful societies where domination is unknown and where women are considered equal citizens and their cultural contributions are encouraged and respected.
For the last two years Genevieve Vaughan, an heiress of the Texan oil boom has supported Heide in her efforts to spread the message. Genevieve has given away her wealth to support feminist writers, scholars and activists from different parts of the world. She is the founder of the Foundation for a Compassionate Society and the protagonist of what she calls the Gift Economy.
Speaker after speaker at the Congress exposed patriarchy as a system of
domination in which war always becomes the main principle of social
organization, the setting of economic policies and the striving for
technological and nuclear advancements all of which pose a threat to life. They
see globalization as the last phase of patriarchy.
Another purpose for holding the World Congresses on Matriarchal Studies is
also to knit together people from across the globe who continue to practice
matriarchy or matriliny since many of these societies and ethnic groups find
themselves marginalized and are under threat from patriarchal societies that
surround them.
Patriarchy in a country like India is suggestive of male domination and women
have just begun to reclaim their lost spaces. It is ironic indeed that in a
nation which venerates all forms of the mother goddess and other female deities,
women should be treated so shabbily. What requires to be researched is at what
point in history matriarchy or the mother-centeredness of the Indian culture
became subsumed by the sub-culture of patriarchy. More and more scholars
worldwide believe that matriarchy must reassert itself in order to overcome the
culture of violence and economic disparity. A beginning has been made in the
West. We can only hope that the effort towards peace-building through societies
cradled in peaceful matriarchies moves forward.
+++
This article has appeared Saturday, 15 October 2005 in a national daily in
India called The Statesman.
About writer Patricia Mukhim
Recommendation: "Daughters of the Seven Huts" is a documentary (DVD,
57 minutes) by Uschi Madeisky and Klaus Werner about the Khasi people of India. (click image to enlarge)
Contents: Aileen lives in the Northeast of India. She belongs to the Khasi
people where women have had the say for centuries. The fates of husbands, sons
and brothers are traditionally determined by the women there. The grandmother is
the chief of the clan and she passes her knowledge and power to the "youngest
daughter" the "Kadduh". Some day Kamtiliin will take responsibility for the
entire clan and in return she will inherit the family home and land. And what is
more, the family money is tied up in the tradition. So when Aileen wants to open
a restaurant her grandmother can not support her financially. Aileen finds a
different way.
Order: please contact
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
until we have found a way of distribution outside
of Germany.
German speakers visit Uschi Madeisky's website: www.ur-kult-ur.de
|